Publications

Best practices guides

Working Group 1: Conflict Prevention

Subproject 3 - Decision Support Tools For Tax, Administrative Authorities and Police

• Developing the tools for the project Digital Better. | In progress

Working Group 2: Conflict Resolution

Subproject 9 - Decision Tools for Legal Practitioners And Adjudicators, Judges and Arbitrators

• Recommendations prepared by the Administrative Conference of the United States being vote | In progress

Working Group 3: Governance and policies

Subproject 10 – Best practices guides–– Review of best practices and polices related specifically to legal technology

Conference

• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, The Great Debate - Are we Allowing Algorithms to Lead our Justice System Forward? Should We? (the role of advocacy, judges, juries, politics), AI for Litigators, Law Society of Ontario (virtual webinar), April 16, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, Technology and the Legal Profession: Ethical Issues and Regulatory Responses, CBA-FLSC Ethics Online Symposium (virtual webinar), May 3, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, Lawyering in the Digital Age: The Duty of Technological Competence and the Virtual Lawyer - Equipping Justice Legal Professionals to Thrive, Department of Justice Canada, Ethical Compass Series (virtual webinar), May 27, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, Going Digital: Choices, Strategy, and Evaluation, ACT Partnership Annual Meeting, University of Montreal (virtual webinar) June 14, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, Data Analytics in the Legal Profession, MDS Computational Linguistics Capstone Seminar, University of British Columbia (virtual webinar) June 25, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, Moderator, Regulating AI in the Legal Marketplace: Where to Draw the Line?, 2021 International Conference of Legal Regulators (virtual webinar), September 30, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, Ethical and Professional Issues: The Promise and Risks of Technology,  Annual National Forum on Administrative Law (virtual conference), October 6, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, Legal Ethics in a Digital World, County of Carleton Law Association (held virtually), November 18, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN, A Lawyer's Duty of Technological Competence: Current Parameters and Future Horizons, Keynote Speech, J. Donald Mawhinney Lectureship in Professional Ethics, Peter A. Allard School of Law, held virtually,  March 11, 2022
• Amy Salyzyn, AI and Legal Ethics: Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, in Florian Martin- Bariteau & Teresa Scassa, (eds) Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2021
• Amy SALYZYN & Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Legal Ethics in a Digital Context, prepared for the Canadian Bar Association Ethics and Professional Responsibility Committee, June 2021

Publications

• Amy SALYZYN, A Taxonomy for Lawyer Technological Competence, Slaw.ca, December 18, 2020 | Published

Subproject 11 - Empowerment of Marginalized Peoples

• Preparation of guidelines for the better accompaniment and empowerment of grassroots and bottom-up data justice initiatives | To be published
• Identification of best practices of empowerment and autonomization based on our case studies and Internet-based review of initiatives | To be published

Subproject 12 - Evaluation and Key Performance Indicators

• Test the framework in a series of applications gathered in the different Subprojects of Working Groups 1, 2 or 3, and identify the guidelines and best practices to evaluate the general impact of AI in the justice sector. | More information to come

Subproject 13 - Ethical and Socio-Political Issues of AI and Autonomization

• AI regulatory frameworks, including in the legal context (2022-2023) | In progress

Books or chapters of books

• David RESTREPO AMARILES, "Algorithmic Decision Systems", in Woodrow Barfield (dir.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, (2020).
• Frank Pascale (dir.), New Laws of Robotics Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI, Harvard University Press, (2020).  
• Amy SALYZYN, "AI and Legal Ethics" in Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Teresa SCASSA (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, (2021).
• Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Teresa SCASSA (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, (2021).
• Jane BAILEY, Jacquelyn BURKELL, Suzie DUNN, Chandal GOSSE, et al. “AI and Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse”, in Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Teresa SCASSA (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, (2021).
• Ignacio COFONE, "AI and Judicial Decision-Making", in Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Teresa SCASSA (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, (2021).
• Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Marina PAVLOVIC, "AI and Contract Law"  in Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Teresa SCASSA (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, (2021).
• Amy SCHMITZ  "Promover La Protección Del Consumidor a Través De La Resolución De Disputas En Línea (Promoting Consumer Protection through Online Dispute Resolution)" in: Agudelo Mejía, D. A. et al. (dir.),  Nuevas dinámicas del Derecho Procesal (New Dynamics of Procedural Law),  Medellín, Sello editorial Universidad de Medellín, University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, (2020). HTML
• Marco GIACALONE, "Alternative dispute resolution e garanzia di accesso alla giustizia : Nuove forme di tutela nello Stato di Diritto", (2020) 78 Studi e Documenti di Diritto Internazionale e Comunitario p.182
• Trevor FARROW, Lesley A. JACOBS (dir.), The Justice Crisis: The Cost and Value of Accessing Law, UBC Press, (2020).
• Karim BENYEKHLEF, Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL (dir.), Le droit à la vie privée en droit québécois et canadien, Éditions Yvon Blais éd., Montréal, (2018). 
• Frank PASQUALE, "The Automated Public Sphere" in  Ann RUDINOW, SÆTNAN, Ingriad SCHNEIDER, Nicola GREEN  The Politics and Policies of Big Data, Big Brother? (2018). 
• Antoinette ROUVROY, "Mapping as governance in an Age of Autonomic Computing: Technology, Virtuality and Utopia" in Pol BARGUÉS-PEDRENY, David CHANDLER, Elena SIMON (dir.), Mapping and Politics in the Digital Age, London: Routledge, (2018), p.118-134.
• Alexei GRINBAUM (dir.), Les Robots et le mal,  Desclée de Brouwer éd., CEA de Saclay, (2019). HTML
• Nicolas VERMEYS, Maria-Fernanda ACEVEDO LANAS, "Online Dispute Resolution Platforms as a Public Service: How the Cyberjustice Laboratory’s Platform to Aid in the Resolution of Litigation Electronically (PARLe) is Transforming the Canadian Justice System." in Immaculada Barral Vinals (dir.), El sistema de ADR/ODR en conflictos de consumo: aproximacion critica y prospeccion de futuro, Barcelone, Atelier, (2019), p. 219.
• Nicolas VERMEYS, "Les modes privés de prévention et de règlement des différends en ligne" in Pierre-Claude LAFOND (dir.), Régler autrement les différends, 2e éd., Montréal, Lexis Nexis, (2018).
• Amy SCHMITZ,  "Resolving a New Kind of Trade War Through ODR"  dans John Lande (dir.), Theories of Change for the Dispute Resolution Movement: Actionable Ideas to Revitalize Our Movement, (2020). PDF

Working papers

• Sylvain LONGHAIS, Document de lecture des données issues de l'inventaire sur les outils algorithmiques dans les administrations publiques, 2021,85 p., document de travail n°31.  
• Alexandra PASCA, Promising Evaluation Practices Guide: A Few Basic Tips, Projet AJC : Chantier 8, 2021,15p.,  document de travail n°27.
• Revue de littérature : Mise en place des contrats intelligents basés sur un registre distribué de type chaîne de blocs (blockchains), working paper n°20, Montreal, Cyberjustice Laboratory, (2018). PDF
• Notice bibliographique – Chaînes de blocs et contrats intelligents, working paper n°21, Montreal, Cyberjustice Laboratory, (2018). PDF
• Les solutions informatiques mises en œuvre dans le cadre de la gestion de la conformité juridique, spécialement dans les secteurs bancaire, financier et des assurances (Regulatory Technologies ou RegTech), working paper n°22, Montreal, Cyberjustice Laboratory, (2018). PDF
• Nicolas VERMEYS, Sara COUTURE, Étude relative aux standards et formats de documents technologiques contenus dans un dossier judiciaire, Study prepared for the Ministère de la Justice du Québec, Montreal, Cyberjustice Laboratory, (2019). PDF
• Fabien Gélinas (dir.), Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the work of its thirty-fifth session, working paper nº19, New York, CNUDCI, (2018). PDF
• Jacquelyn BURKELL, The Challenges of Algorithmic Bias, working paper, Law Society of Ontario Special Lectures, Ontario, The University of Western Ontario, (2019). PDF
• Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL, Karim BENYEKHLEF,  Eve GAUMOND (dir.), Repenser la protection des renseignements personnels à la lumière des défis soulevés par l’IA , working paper, Montréal, OBVIA,  (2020).  PDF
• Lyse LANGLOIS, Réjean ROY, Guillaume MACAUX et Eve GAUMOND, Analyse sur l'application de notification de contacts proposée par Mila, working paper, OBVIA, (2020). PDF
• Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL (dir.), Petit guide sur les enjeux et opportunités des applications de notifications d’exposition à la COVID-19, OBVIA, (2020). PDF

Inventories

• Tomas VAZQUEZ ROJAS, Algorithmes et administration publique, 2021,18 p., document de travail n°29.  
• Laboratoire de Cyberjustice (dir.), Numéro spécial : Droit algorithmique, Revue Lex Electronica, (2020).
• Option consommateur (dir.), Projet de loi n° 64 – Loi modernisant des dispositions législatives en matière de protection des renseignements personnels (mémoire d'Option consommateur), (2020).
• Option Consommateurs (dir.), Les mécanismes de règlement des différends proposés par les plateformes de l’économie du partage. Des outils efficaces pour l’accès à la justice? Research Report - Access to Justice, (2020).
• Laboratoire de cyberjustice (dir.), Les solutions informatiques mises en œuvre dans le cadre de la gestion de la conformité juridique, spécialement dans les secteurs bancaire, financier et des assurances (Regulatory Technologies ou RegTech), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, (2018).  PDF
• Thomas Clay (dir.), L’arbitrage en ligne, Commission ad hoc, Rapport du club des Juristes, France : Paris, École de droit de la Sorbonne, (2019).  PDF
• Lisa MOORE, Trevor  FARROW (dir.), Investir dans la justice: revue de littérature en faveur de la nécessité d'améliorer l'accès, Task Force on Justice Toronto: Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, (2019).   PDF

Working Group 1: Conflict Prevention

Subproject 1 - Pre-Conflict Decision Tools: Orienting Litigants and Defendants

• Pre-Conflict Decisions Tools: Orienting Litigants and Defendants: Review of Literature | Published
• Literature Survey | « Inventaire des outils d’intelligence artificielle favorisant la prévention des conflits pour les citoyens » | Published
• Lisa MOORE, Trevor C.W FARROW (dir.), Investir dans la justice: revue de littérature en faveur de la nécessité d'en améliorer l'accès, rapport préparé pour le Groupe de travail sur la justice Toronto: Forum canadien sur la justice civile, Forum canadien sur la justice civile, (2019). 
• Valentin CALLIPEL, Karl BRANTING L, Les JACOBS et Trevor FARROW (dir.), Inventaire des outils d'intelligence artificielle favorisant la prévention des conflits pour les citoyens, inventory subproject 1 ACT , Cyberjustice Laboratory, (2018). PDF

Subproject 3 - Decision Support Tools For Tax, Administrative Authorities and Police

• An inventory consisting of example applications that demonstrate the conflict preventing best-practices in legal organizations | In progress
• An inventory of common practices, and state of the art technologies of decision tools that are used, or under development by legal authorities | In progress

Subproject 4 – Smart Contracts and Regulation Technologies

• Aidin RASTI, From legal contracts to smart contracts: An Xtext editor for Symboleo with a code generator for Hyperledger Fabric, Demonstration, CASCON x EVOKE 2021, online, Canada, November 24, 2021. | To be published
• Daniel AMYOT,  Alireza PARVIZIMOSAED, A., John MYLOPOULOS, Mylopoulos,  CyPreSS ORF: The Symboleo Project, Invited presentation, CASCON x EVOKE Workshop on Software Techniques for Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems, online, Canada, November 25, 2021. | To be published
• Symboleo-CC: a Symboleo legal contract specification verification tool built around the nuXmv model checking tool
• Symboleo-IDE: an Eclipse editor for the Symboleo language, with JavaScript code generator for smart contracts on the Hyperledger Fabric platform
• The Symboleo language ontology, with corresponding code in EMF, Umple and Java
• Thesis of Aidin Rasti (M.Sc. in computer science) | To be published
• Thesis of Alireza Parvizimosaed (Ph.D. in computer science) | To be published
• Daniel AMYOT, Symboleo: a language for specifying/verifying legal contracts and generating smart contracts, Seminar presentation, École Polytechnique, Canada, April 14, 2022. | To be published
• Daniel AMYOT, Contract Specification and Verification: Experience with the Symboleo Language, Keynote presentation, 15th International Workshop on Value Modeling and Business Ontologies (VMBO 2021), online, Italy, March 5, 2021. | To be published
• Daniel AMYOT, Contract specification and verification: Experience with the Symboleo language, Seminar presentation, LATECE, UQAM, online, Canada, May 19, 2021. | To be published
• Alberto LOPES,  Languages for Legal Contract Specifications. | To be published
• Sepehr SHARIFI, Smart Contracts: From Formal Specification to Blockchain Code, Master thesis, UOttawa, 2020. | To be published
• David RESTREPO AMARILES (dir.), Conclusion from the International Seminar on Administrative Law and Artificial Intelligence, Centro de Estudios Europeos, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, (2019).

Working Group 2: Conflict Resolution

Subproject 5 - Pilot Project with the Office de la protection du consommateur du Québec (OPC)

• Union des consommateurs, La justice en ligne comme solution aux barrières à l'accès à la justice ?, Rapport final, (2022).
• Union des consommateurs, Online justice: a Solution to Accessing Traditional Justice Services ?, Final report, (2022).
• Winkler Institute (dir.), Winkler Institute for Dispute Resolution ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 , annual report, (2020).

Subproject 5 - Pilot Project with the Office de la protection du consommateur du Québec (OPC) & Subproject 6 - Pilot Project with the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) of Ontario

• Amy, SCHMITZ | List of ODR providers | Published

Subproject 7 - Distributive Justice Processes Using Immersive Video Technologies

• Review of case management systems etc. | In progress
• Virtual reality platforms used by architects to model courts | In progress
• A review of the most widely used platforms for virtual courts | Pulished

Subproject 8 - Tools for Self-Represented Litigants

• Annotated Bibliography: Direct-to-Public Legal Services – Impact Evaluation, 2020, 200 pages | Published
• Inventory of A2J Author Technology in USA, 2019, 15 pages | Published
•  Alexandra PASCA, Fabien GÉLINAS (dir.), Inventory of A2J Author Technology in USA , document de travail, Chantier 8, 2021 PDF
• Fabien GÉLINAS (dir.), Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the work of its thirty-fifth session, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, (2018).
• Meredith ROSSNER, Martha MCCURDY (dir.), Video Hearings Process Evaluation (Phase 2) Final Report, report, London School of Economics, (2020). PDF

Subproject 9 - Decision Tools for Legal Practitioners And Adjudicators, Judges and Arbitrators

• Kayla BURRIS, Taylor LAIN, Kazia NOWACKI & Fredric LEDERER, Modern Frenemies: Lawyers and Legal AI | To be published
• Determine the extent to which AI predictions are now in use in the legal professions, are clearly under development, or are being seriously contemplated. Analysis of 93 potential "solutions" to help legal professionals. | To be published

Working Group 3: Governance and policies

Subproject 10 – Inventory –– Inventory and content analysis of AI framework documents (Qualitative Analysis)

Conferences

• Amy SALYZYN, Speaker, Technological Competence for Lawyers, Legal Education Society of Alberta (virtual webinar), May 19, 2021

Publications

• Riikka Koulu, Havu, K. & Hirvonen, H., Regulating AI is the current legislation capable of dealing with AI? , Finnish Centre for Artificial Intelligence | Published
• Riikka KOULU, Human control over automation: EU policy and AI ethics, European Journal of Legal Studies 1/2020 pp. 9-46. | Published
• Riika KOULU, Proceduralising control and discretion: human oversight in artificial intelligence policy, Maastricht Journal for European and Comparative Law, 2020 | Published
• Riika KOULU, Crafting digital transparency: implementing legal values into algorithmic design, Critical Analysis of Law , April 2021 | Published
• Riikka KOULU, Laura KONTIAINEN, Suvi SANKARI, Shift the perspective and see differently: Access to justice as a boundary object for interdisciplinary algorithm studies, submitted in 2022, under review in Frontiers in Computer Science | Published

Subproject 10 – Inventory – Inventory and content analysis of AI framework documents (Quantitative Analysis)

Conferences

• Giampiero Lupo, Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: Normative Frameworks and the Risks Related to AI in the Judiciary, Technologies of Normalization, Sep.-Oct. 2020.
• Giampiero LUPO, Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: Normative Frameworks and the Risks Related to AI in the Judiciary, ACT Workshop, Nov. 2020.
• Giampiero LUPO, Risky Artificial Intelligence: What the Role of Accidents will be in the Path to AI Regulation,  Condition Critical: Disruption, disaster and the challenges to law, Online seminar, Sep.-Oct 2021.

Publications

• Giampiero LUPO, Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: How Normative Frameworks Protect Citizens from the Risks Related to AI Use in the Judiciary, European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 8(2), 75-96, 2019. | Published
• Giampiero LUPO, The ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An analysis of ethical frameworks disciplining AI in justice and other contexts of application, Oñati Socio-legal Series (ISSN 2079-5971), 2022 | Published

Subproject 10 – Inventory – Typology of currently existing legal technologies that use automation/AI

Conferences

• Amy SALYZYN, Legal Technology: Tools and Regulatory Responses, Virtual Presentation to Law Society of Ontario, Technology Taskforce, October 23, 2019
• Amy SALYZYN, Judging by Numbers: How Will Judicial Analytics Impact the Justice System and Its Stakeholders?, Canadian Association for Legal Ethics Annual Conference, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie, October 23, 2020

Publications

• Jena MCGILL abd Amy SALYZYN, Judging by Numbers: How will judicial analytics impact the justice system and its stakeholders?, 44:1 (2021) Dalhousie Law Journal 250.  | To be published
• Inventory | To be published

Subproject 11 - Empowerment of Marginalized Peoples

• Studies on empowering marginalized groups and communities using digital technologies and AI | Inventory year 2 | To be published
• Studies on empowering marginalized groups and communities using digital technologies and AI | Inventory Year 1 | To be published
• Kate ROBERTSON, Cynthia KHOO, Yolanda SONG (dir.), To Surveil and Predict : a Human Rights Analysis of Algorithmic Policing in Canada, The Citizen Lab, University of Toronto Faculty of Law, (2020).  HTML
• Karine GENTELET, Alexandra BAHARY-DIONNE (dir.), Les angles morts des réponses technologiques à la pandémie de COVID-19: Disjonction entre les inégalités en santé et numériques structurantes de la marginalisation de certaines populations , OBVIA, (2020).

Subproject 13 - Ethical and Socio-Political Issues of AI and Autonomization

• Bibliographie annotée de la littérature sur les questions éthiques liés aux tech IA | In progress
• Scoping review of ethical issues in the implementation of AI technologies in the justice system | To be published

Subproject 14 – Increase the intelligibility of online dockets and access to justice by mobilizing artificial intelligence

• Interview results / scientific article on the intelligibility of the new plumitifs generated by the software | In progress
• 4 scientific articles on the AI techniques used to create the software | Done
• Final report on the impact of the software on the legibility of the plumitifs | Done
• Software development for SOQUIJ | Done

Subproject 14 – Intellectual property issues in the extraction and reuse of legal data for of legal data for automated process development

• Scientific article | In progress
• Scientific article | In progress

Subproject 14 – Towards a synergetic approach to the dematerialization of judicial files: protection of the privacy of the litigant as a vector of access to justice

• Literature review on adoption and implementation of online court records in Canada | In progress
• Literature update on the legal norms that protect privacy in the judicial system | In progress
• Final Report : governance framework and privacy policy for the online publication of court records | Fall 2023
• Survey on the perception of open legal data and the protection of privacy in digital court records | Fall 2022
• Literature review on the impact of AI on the protection of publicly available information | In progress
• Inventory of personal information in court records (scientific article) | In progress

Subproject 15 - Security Issues Stemming from AI Tools

• Cybersecurity risks associated with the deployment of ai technologies by justice actors (Literature review) | Published
• Benoit DUPONT, Yuan STEVENS, Hannes WESTERMANN, Michael JOYCE (dir.), Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Crime and Criminal Justice , Korean Institute of Criminology, Canada Research Chair in Cybersecurity, ICCC, Université de Montréal, (2018). PDF

Blogs

• Camille BORDERE, Frédérique BOLANGER, « DataJust: l'heure du bilan en France », Laboratoire de cyberjustice (25 octobre 2022).
• Jie ZHU, « JurisOracle: Et si l'on imaginait le futur de l'accès au droit et à la justice », Laboratoire de cyberjustice (14 octobre 2022).
• Jinzhe TAN, « Kleros: Gaming in justice », Laboratoire de cyberjustice (16 septembre 2022).
• Aurore CLÉMENT TROUSSEL, “ L’étude des sciences, de la technologie et de la société : Quelles contributions dans le domaine du droit ? ”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (July 28, 2022).
• Rémi SLAMA, “Digital Markets Act / Digital Service Act, l’Europe entend contrer l’hégémonie des GAFAM”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (July 20, 2022).
• Jinzhe TAN, “The Future of ODR: Immersive technology enhancement and underlying technology evolution”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (July 19, 2022).
• Sylvain LONGHAIS, “L’implantation et l’utilisation des outils d’intelligence artificielle dans l’administration publique”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (June 21, 2022).
• Rémi SLAMA, “L’intelligence artificielle en fiscalité, entre mythe et réalité”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (May 29, 2022).
• Sébastien MEEÙS, “Jeux vidéo, Metaverse et habitudes numériques de la jeunesse — Perspectives juridiques du projet Lego x Epic Games x Sony”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (April 19, 2022).
• Jinzhe TAN, “Legal Self-help Tools in China”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (February 22, 2022).
• Sébastien MEEÙS, “Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) à l’ère du Web 3.0 |Cartographie des enjeux juridiques”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (February 3, 2022).
• Rémi SLAMA, “La Chine annonce avoir développé une intelligence artificielle capable de remplacer les juges”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (February 1, 2022).
• Jie ZHU, “De l’intelligence au droit artificiel”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (November 16, 2021).
• Sylvain LONGHAIS, “Une introduction au concept de « nudge » : genèse, mise en pratique et application numérique”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (November 15, 2021).
• Sylvain LONGHAIS, “ Les techniques algorithmiques de l’IA | L’approche connexionniste”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (January 5, 2021).
• Jie ZHU, « Les techniques algorithmiques de l’IA | Support vector machine », Laboratoire de cyberjustice (17 décembre 2020). HTML
• Tomas ROJAS VAZQUEZ, « L’inférence bayésienne : l’intelligence artificielle par la statistique », Laboratoire de cyberjustice (16 décembre 2020).
• Simon DU PERRON, “Les algorithmes évolutionnaires : la sélection naturelle au service de l’intelligence artificielle”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (December 15 2020).
• lona BOIS-DRIVET,“ Les techniques algorithmiques de l’IA | Billet introductif ”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (December 14, 2020).
• lona BOIS-DRIVET,“L’intelligence artificielle symbolique : qu’en est-il aujourd’hui ?”, Cyberjustice Laboratory (December 14, 2020).
• Anne-Sophie HULIN, « Introduction à la fiducie québécoise de données », Cyberjustice Laboratory (November 26, 2020).
• David RESTREPO AMARILES, « Developing an Automated Compliance App to Help Firms Comply with Privacy Regulations »,HEC Paris, (October 27th, 2020). 
• Simon DU PERRON, « Le temps des réformes : cinq comparaisons entre le projet de loi n° 64 et le projet de loi C-11 », Laboratoire de cyberjustice (24 novembre 2020).
• Jie ZHU, "La production de la preuve technologique par des moyens technologiques : l’empreinte tentaculaire d’un monde en vase clos", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (August 17,  2020).
• Simon DU PERRON, "La Nouvelle-Zélande se dote d’une Charte des algorithmes", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (August 10,2020).
• Jie ZHU, " Retour sur l’expérience judiciaire en temps de pandémie : quelle technologisation de notre justice ? ", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (August 6, 2020).
• Hélène GAVRILOVIC, " Les mécanismes de règlement des différends des plateformes de l’économie du partage sont-ils des outils efficaces d’accès à la justice ? ", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July, 20  2020).
• Simon DU PERRON, " Projet de loi 64 : une réforme à l’Européenne du droit à la protection des renseignements personnels", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (June 17,  2020).
• Simon DU PERRON, "COVIDSafe : l’application australienne qui fait bon élève", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (May 15, 2020).
• Mark LIKHTEN, Sylvain LONGHAIS, "Covid-19 et applications de traçage : Le droit ne doit pas céder aux chants des sirènes du solutionnisme technologique", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (May 11, 2020).
• Cassandra LAROCQUE-RIGNEY, "Le recours aux données de géolocalisation en temps de pandémie : problème ou solution ?", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (9 avril 2020).
• Cassandra LAROCQUE-RIGNEY, "La prévention et le règlement des différends à travers l’Union européenne : la Commission rend son rapport", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (18 mars 2020).
• Simon DU PERRON, "Le Data Protection Act of 2020 : vers une Agence américaine de protection des données ?",  Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (March 17, 2020).
• Alexandra BAHARY-DIONNE, Karine GENTELET, "Élargir les horizons de l'intelligence artificielle centrée sur l'humain", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (November 29,  2019).
• Laetitia DIMANCHE, Erwan Jonchères, "Les travailleurs du clic et l'intelligence artificielle", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (21 juin 2019).
• Pierre LEGROS, "Partie II – JTC Resource Bulletin, « ODR for Courts ». De la mise en place de l’ODR, vers une expérience réussie", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (21 juin 2019).
• Pierre LEGROS, "Partie I - JTC Resource Bulletin, « ODR for Courts » Le règlement des conflits à l’ère numérique, une évolution nécessaire des tribunaux au bénéfice de chacun", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (29 mai 2019).
• Valentin CALLIPEL, "Blogue introductif", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July 24, 2018).
• Karima SMOUK, "La cyberjustice : le remède à une justice en quarantaine ?", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (March 24, 2020).
• Soleïca MONNIER, "Pourquoi l'open source est-il omniprésent en IA ?", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (October 22, 2018).
• Soleïca MONNIER, "Note de lecture : L'empire des données", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (November 12,  2018).
• Sarit MIZRAHI, "La mise au point de véhicules autonomes: au-delà du dilemme du tramway 3.0", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (February 27,  2019).
• Laura BAUDIN, Martine GAGNON, "L'Open data juridique" , Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (July 24, 2018).
• Laura BAUDIN, "La démocratisation de l'accès à la justice par l'emploi des Legal Tech",  Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July 24, 2018).
• Laura BAUDIN, "Vers une réglementation européenne sur la robotique et l'intelligence artificielle", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July 24, 2018).
• Jie ZHU, "Se tisser une vie privée sur la Toile :  L'avenir d'une illusion", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (24 juillet 2018).
• Jie ZHU, "L'avenir de l'intelligence artificielle: les portes tournantes de la Maison Blanche ", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July 24, 2018).
• Jie ZHU, "Regard sur le Deep Learning", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (July 24, 2018).
• Jie ZHU, "Canada Treasury Board's Directive on Automated Decision-Making", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (November 25, 2018).
• Jie ZHU, "Bots at the Gate: d'autres temps, d'autres mœurs, d'autres systèmes" , Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (December 5, 2018).
• François BROCHU-LEMAY, "MiDAS: L'intelligence artificielle devenue juge, jury et bourreau", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July 24,  2018).
• Florimond ÉPÉE, Robin TIBLE, "La nécessité d'une adaptation législative encadrant les possibilités découlant des évolutions de l'intelligence artificielle", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July 24, 2018).
• Florimond ÉPÉE, "La protection des données personnelles au Canada à l'ère des données massives", Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog  (July 24, 2018).
• Anastasia KONINA, ”RegTech's Spillover: From Technological Infrastructure to the Epitome of Private Governance”, Cyberjustice Laboratory Blog (July 24, 2018).

Press articles

• Ryad Titah, "Villes numériques : les technologies de l'information pour faire face aux grands défis urbains", LaPresse, (October 4, 2020).
• Valentin CALLIPEL, Karim BENYEKHLEF, "Algorithmes et Justice : Une prudente avancée", Business & Legal Forum, (September 24, 2020). PDF
• Yves FAGUY, "Legal futures round-up", CBA National, (April 10, 2018). PDF
• Yves FAGUY, "Legal futures round-up", CBA National, (July 4, 2018). PDF
• UdeM Nouvelles, "Lancement d’un important projet de recherche international en IA et justice à l’UdeM", (June 20, 2018).
• Thierry MAUBANT, "Un important projet de recherche international en intelligence artificielle et Justice lancé à Montréal", Actu IA, (July 4, 2018).
• Pierre LEGROS, « Online Dispute Resolution, un complément indispensable à la justice d'aujourd'hui et de demain », Village de la Justice, (February 10, 2020).
• Philippe MERCURE, "l'intelligence artificielle au service de la justice", LaPresse + , (June 17, 2018). PDF
• Mathieu PAPILLON, "Des juges-robots au tribunal : entre fiction et appréhension", Radio-Canada, ( July 3, 2018). PDF
• Ville de Montréal, "Lancement du plus important projet de recherche international en intelligence artificielle et justice", ID MTL – Ville de Montréal (June 20, 2018). PDF
• Dominique BOULLIER, "Avec les réseaux sociaux numériques, l’événement devient un fait social", Le temps des médias, (May 28, 2018). PDF
• Alexei GRINBAUM, "Pour "liker", veuillez patienter", Quotidien Libération, (April 7, 2019).
• AJRN – RRAJ, "Cyberjustice Laboratory launches major “Autonomy through Cyberjustice Technologies” Research Project", (June 19, 2018). PDF
• David TAIT, Meredith ROSSNER, "Courts Are Moving to Video during Coronavirus, but Research Shows It’s Hard to Get a Fair Trial Remotely", The Conversation, (April 8,  2020).
• Benoit DUPONT, "Covid-19: Les Dérives Possibles de Surveillance Des Données Personnelles" The Conversation, (May 29, 2020).
• Amy SALYZYN, "Trial by Zoom : What Virtual hearings might mean for Open Courts, Participants Privacy and the Integrity of Court Proceedings" The Conversation, (April 17,  2020).

Presentations

• Giampero LUPO, "Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: Normative Frameworks and the Risks Related to AI in the Judiciary", October 13, 2020.
• Amy SCHMITZ, Nicolas VERMEYS " Arbitration Conversation #41: Prof. Nicolas Vermeys of the University of Montreal", September, 2020.
• Amy SCHMITZ "The Arbitration Conversation: Amy Schmitz Interviews the Leading Minds in Arbitration", Arbitrate.com, July 2020.
• Meredith ROSSNER, "Online Courts: How to measure “justice” and “fairness"", The Legal Education Foundation, March 7, 2019.
• Yves GINGRAS, « Éloge de l'homo techno-logicus », Cyberjustice  Laboratory and LexUM Chair, October 16, 2018.
• Stéphane BERNATCHEZ, " De la démocratie par le droit à la dictature des algorithmes ? La théorie juridique au XXIe siècle ", Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair, October 23, 2019.
• Sarit K. MIZRAHI, "Faux-riginality in an Age of Mass Production: Why Copyright Should Not Protect Machine-Generated Content", conférences Jeunes chercheurs, LexUM Chair, February 18, 2020.
• Randy GOEBEL, "Legal Text Analysis using AI | Chapter 2", LexUM Chair, 26 février 2020.
• Przemysław PAŁKA, "CLAUDETTE: Empowering Consumers through Artificial Intelligence ", McGill University, February 5, 2020.
• Pierre-luc DÉZIEL, "Quel rôle pour le droit à l'ère des agents autonomes décentralisés ? ", McGill University, november 30, 2018.
• Pierre Trudel, "Le rapport Le temps d’agir et la mise à niveau des lois sur les communications : pour une régulation raisonnée des activités se déroulant sur Internet", Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair,  March 10, 2020.
• Noel CORRIVEAU, "Pour une utilisation responsable de l'intelligence artificielle au gouvernement du Canada", Cyberjustice Laboratory, April 10, 2019.
• Nicole RIGILLO, "What does a Decision become in the Era of Artificial Intelligence ?", Cyberjustice Laboratory and Mcgill University, November 26, 2019.
• Nicolas VERMEYS, "ODR, l’expérience canadienne à l’aube des projets français", Institut de Recherche Juridique de la Sorbonne, March 1, 2019.
• Nicolas VERMEYS, "ODR Industry Summit", Cyberjustice Laboratory, March 4-5, 2019.
• Mason Kortz, "Artificial Testimony: Algorithms and Legal Proof", Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair, 12 avril 2018.
• Cyberjustice Laboratory,  "ICAL 2019" , Cyberjustice Laboratory and ICAIL, June 17-21,  2019.
• Laboratoire de cyberjustice, " An Open Discussion on Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as a Public Service ", MaRS Center Toronto, March 28, 2019.
• Laboratoire de cyberjustice, "LA JUSTICE DE LA CONSOMMATION EN 2018 Du règlement en ligne des conflits aux outils d’intelligence artificielle Regards croisés Europe / Canada", Université de Montréal, April 5, 2018.
• L. Thorne MCCARTY, Ejan MACKAAY, " On Semi-Supervised Learning of Legal Semantics ", Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair,  April 19, 2018.
• Kevin ASHLEY, " World Authority Underlines Potential of AI Data Mining for Law ", HEC Paris, March 29, 2019.
• Katie  SZILAGYI, " Self-Driving Laws | Rule of Law Problems and the Machine Regulation Thesis ", cycle de conférences Jeunes-chercheurs, LexUM Chair, January 23,  2019.
• Karim BENYEKHLEF, Valentin CALLIPEL, "Partenariat et participation du Laboratoire de cyberjustice à la conférence IA en Mission Sociale", Cyberjustice Laboratory, AIIA, March 21-22, 2019.
• Karim BENYEKHLEF, " Algorithmes et État de droit, Rencontres Expertes du Lab ", Cyberjustice Laboratory, October 9, 2019.
• Karim BENYEKHLEF, " Karim Benyekhlef, conférencier lors de l’événement Legal.It ", Young Bar of Quebec (JBM), March 22, 2019.
• Karim BENYEKHLEF, " Les matinées expertes du Laboratoire de cyberjustice " , Cyberjustice Laboratory, October 10, 2018.
• Karim BENYEKHLEF, "Quelles sont les limites de la liberté d'expression sur internet", Émission Gravel le matin, Radio-Canada, 28 décembre 2018.
• Jill R. PRESSER, Carla SWANSBURG, Amy SALYZYN " Conférences spéciales 2019: Innovation, technologie et pratique du droit ", Ontario Bar, November 21-22, 2019.
• Jean-François GAGNÉ, " Vers une démocratie algorithmique ? ", Cycle de conférences 2019-2020 Démocratie, algorithme et information, LexUM Chair, February 19, 2020.
• Jackie CHI KIT CHEUNG, " Legal Text Analysis using AI | Chapter 1 ", LexUM Chair, December 3, 2019.
• Isabelle SAYN, " Justice « prédictive » et droits fondamentaux ", Cycle de conférences 2019-2020 Démocratie, algorithme et information , Cyberjustice Laboratory, LexUM Chair, September 24, 2019.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, Yuan STEVENS "Crime and Punishment in the Age of Artificial Intelligence ", Cycle de conférence Jeunes chercheurs, LexUM Chair, February 19, 2019.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, " Increasing access to justice by using artificial intelligence to interpret case law ", Cyberjustice Laboratory, March 4, 2020.
• Hannes  WESTERMANN, " Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Sector ", Cyberjustice Laboratory, McGill University, November 13, 2019.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, " Legal Data Mining, Machine Learning and Visualization ", HEC Paris, March 21, 2019.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, " JusticeBot: Simplifying Access to Legal Information Using AI ", Young Researchers Conference in Artificial Intelligence and Law, Cyberjustice Laboratory, February 25, 2019.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, "I.A. & Droit: Présentation du projet « JusticeBot » ", Cyberjustice Laboratory, November 1st, 2018.
• Gilbert BABIN, " Artificial Intelligence: Explainable, Accountable & Ethical ? ", Conférence jeunes chercheurs en intelligence artificielle et droit, Cyberjustice Laboratory, February 25, 2019.
• Fred TURNER, " The Democratic Surround: Media and the Dream of a Liberal Commons in Cold War America ", Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair, 20 March, 2018.
• François JARRIGE, " Face au déferlement technique: conflits et négociations à l'aube de l'ère industrielle ", Cyberjustice Laboratory, LexUM Chair, October 23, 2018.
• Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, " Lex cryptographia : la fin de l'État de droit ? ", Cyberjustice Laboratory, LexUM Chair, February 20, 2019.
• Florian, MARTIN-BARITEAU, " Penser le droit à l'heure de la chaîne de blocs et de l'automatisation ", Cyberjustice Laboratory and Mcgill University, March 11, 2019.
• Éric SADIN, "L’intelligence artificielle : le pouvoir d’énoncer la vérité", Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair, April 9, 2019.
• David RESTREPO AMARILES, "Atelier niveau expert - Machine learning for lawyers", European Incubator of the Brussels Bar, March 14, 2019.
• Brian CLIFTON, Sam LAVIGNE, Peter SPIVACK "The Use of AI in White-Collar Crime" , Mcgill University, February 25,  2019.
• Bianca TOMAZELI, François ELIE, "SQiL 2019 – Grande conférence sur le logiciel libre et le secteur public", Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair, september 25, 2019.
• Beverly RICH, "How AI is Changing Contracts", Cyberjustice Laboratory and Mcgill University, March 13, 2019.
• Benoît DUPONT, "Policy Surveillance in the Field of Cybercrime Prevention: An Opportunity to Move Beyond ad hoc Interventions (and to compare cyber apples to digital oranges)", The First Annual Conference on the Human Factor in Cybercrime, October 15, 2018.
• Benjamin ALARIE, " The Promise of AI for Positive Comparative Law ", McGill University, November 20,  2018.
• Benjamin ALARIE, " Artificial Intelligence ", The Canadian Tax Foundation’s, 28 février 2019.
• Antoinette ROUVROY, " Penser la condition numérique: enjeux sémiotiques, politiques et éthiques de la gouvernementalité algorithmique ", Seminar"La Condition humaine à l'heure des N.B.I.C." SciencesPo Doctoral School, 29 mars 2018.
• Antoinette  ROUVROY, " Rethinking critique and critical legal studies in a civilization of digital signals and algorithms ", Evénement International Conference "Critical Stances - Critique as Practice ", Lueneburg. - Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Allemagne, 23 juin 2018.
• Antoinette ROUVROY, " Intelligence artificielle entre fiction et action (transcription publiée d'une conférence donnée à l'ENSAE): La gouvernementalité algorithmique ", Evénement Intelligence Artificielle : fiction ou actions ? Chair of Innovation and Regulation of Digital Services and ENSAE Alumni, March 15, 2018.
• Antoine GARAPON,  Jean LASSÈGUE, ”Justice digitale : Révolution graphique et rupture anthropologique”, Cyberjustice Laboratory, March 7, 2019.
• Amy SCHMITZ, ”Dangers of Digitizing Due Process”, Cyberjustice Laboratory and LexUM Chair, March 27, 2019.
• Alexis FITZJEAN O'COBHTHAIGH, ”Grande conférence de la SQiL 2018 sur les politique publiques d’Internet”, Cyberjustice Laboratory, LexUM Chair and FACIL, September 19, 2018. HTML
• Alexei GRINBAUM, “La valeur éthique du hasard pour les systèmes autonomes“, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie, February 28,  2019. HTML
• Nicolas VERMEYS, Benoit DUPONT, "Enjeux de la cybersécurité reliés à une pandémie", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 25, 2020.
• Karl BRANTING L, Kevin ASHLEY, Tom VAN ENGERS "AI'S Contribution to the Administration of Justice", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory,  June 16, 2020.
• David RESTREPO AMARILES, "Exploring Compliance Technologies for Privacy" , virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 29, 2020.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, Erwan JONCHÈRES, Louis ROY, Gilbert BABIN, "Résilience de la blockchain et de ses applications juridiques en temps de crise", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 26, 2020.
• Nicolas VERMEYS, "Les incidences de l’intelligence artificielle sur la fonction judiciaire et les juges", Colloque de la magistrature, Montreal, November 4, 2019.
• Nicolas VERMEYS, "Faux documents, mystification et Hypertrucage : comment peut-on se fier à la preuve technologique ? ", Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice Annual Conference, Québec, 18 octobre 2019.
• Nicolas VERMEYS, Paul EMBLEY, Diana GRASKI, "Technology Update:AI, Machine Learning & Data Science", National Association for Court Management Annual Conference, Las Vegas, July 22, 2019.
• Ève GAUMOND, Nicolas GARNEAU, David BEAUCHEMIN, "Intelligibility of Digital Court Records The Criminal Docket Experience", within ACT Annual Meeting, June 2020.
• Jacquelyn BURKELL, Jane BAILEY, "Explainable AI” and reasons for judicial decisions", Faculty of Law Latrobe University, Melbourne, Australia, December 2019.
• Amy SCHMITZ, "Dangers of Digitizing Due Process", Cycle of  conferences, LexUM Chair on Legal Information, March 27, 2020.
• Amy SCHMITZ, "Governance for ODR, National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution Resources", The National Centre for Technology & Dispute Resolution, January 15th, 2020.
• Amy SCHMITZ, "ODR Progress and Insights: Court System Design & Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities", National Center for Technology and Dispute Resolution Resources, January 25, 2020.
• Amy SCHMITZ, "In The Know webinar - Online Dispute Resolution “ODR” and You", ABA Section on Business Law, “In the Know” CLE Program, April 22, 2020.
• Amy SCHMITZ,  "ODR in the ERA of COVID-19: Experts Answer Your Questions", ABA Free Webinar, March 20,  2020.
• Amy SCHMITZ, "Empowerment through E-Courts & Public Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) ?", Universidade Mackenzie, Brazil, April 3,  2020.

Conferences and activities

• Frank PASCALE, "Web-conference : New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI", HumanIA, December 7, 2020.
• Christophe VILLEMER, Guillaume HELLER, "Webinaire | Jami, un outil de communication au service de la vie privée", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, April 29, 2020.
• Patricia BYRNE, Drew JACKSON, David KANDESTIN, Chris MCGRATH, "Webinaire | Beagle, a Chatbot that Helps with Everyday Legal Problems", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 14, 2020.
• Richard ROGERS, "Webinaire : Improving Access to Justice Through User-Focused ODR", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 20, 2020.
• Xavier BEAUCHAMP, Frédéric PELLETIER, "Programmer une fonction de traitement jurisprudentiel automatisée à CanLII", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 3, 2020. 
• Erik BORNMANN, Carl ABRAHAMSON, Judith A. WAHL, "Webinar | CLEO’s direct-to-public Guided Pathways for Powers of Attorney", virtual program of the cyberjustice Laboratory, June 4, 2020.
• Sylvain LONGHAIS, Julien BOIS, "Web-conférence |Cybersécurité : comment se protéger, son entreprise et ses clients en respectant les bonnes pratiques et exigences légales", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 26, 2020.
• Sylvain LONGHAIS, Nicolas VERMEYS, Benoit DUPONT,  "Web-entretien | Enjeux de la cybersécurité reliés à une pandémie", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 25, 2020.
• Cassandra LAROCQUE-RIGNEY, Élisa HENRY, Chantal BERNIER, "COVID-19 : vie privée et protection des données", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 18, 2020.
• Cassandra LAROCQUE-RIGNEY, Karl BRANTING, Kevin ASHLEY, Tom VAN ENGERS, "Web conference | AI'S Contribution to the Administration of Justice", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 15, 2020.
• Cassandra LAROCQUE-RIGNEY, Mélanie BOURASSA FORCIER, Martin GIBERT, Daniel WEINSTOCK, RYOA CHUNG, "Web-entretien | Enjeux éthiques du recours à l'intelligence artificielle en temps de pandémie", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 15, 2020.
• Simon DU PERRON, Jean-François GAGNÉ, "Pandémie, surveillance et démocratie", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory.
• Sylvain LONGHAIS, Philippe MOURON, "L'exploration de la patrimonialité des données personnelles", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory.
• Hélène GAVRILOVIC, Marie-Claude SARRAZIN, "Web-conférence | Assermentation par des moyens technologiques", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 5, 2020.
• Hélène GAVRILOVIC, Clément SAMSON, Paul-Matthieu GRONDIN,  "Web-conférence | Retour d’expérience sur la tenue des audiences virtuelles en temps de pandémie", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 8, 2020.
• Guilem SOLER SOLÉ, "El Juicio, instrumento para la justicia : Desafíos tecnológicos en tiempos de pandemia (y para el futuro) - spanish version", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 10, 2020.
• Hélène GAVRILOVIC, Guilem SOLER SOLÉ,  "Web conference | The Trial as the Means for Justice: Technological Challenges in Pandemic Times", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June10, 2020.
• Hélène GAVRILOVIC, Romain BOULET, "Non-conformité de la visio-conférence devant la Chambre de l'Instruction en matière criminelle", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, June 11, 2020.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, "Workshop | Understanding Smart Contracts", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 28, 2020.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, David RESTREPO AMARILES, "Exploring Compliance Technologies for Privacy", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 29, 2020.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, Alexander BERNIER, "Blockchain, Data Protection, and Health Data Management", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 27, 2020.
• Maggy BOGETTO, Mark LIKHTEN, Shannon SALTER, Daniel RAINEY, "Web-talk | Online Dispute Resolution in Labor Law", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 20,  2020.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, "ODRAI – JusticeBot, prototype et challenge", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 19, 2020.
• Tomas VAZQUEZ ROJAS, Nancy LEGGETT-BACHAND  "Retour d'expérience : les cliniques Portes 33 de Justice ProBono", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory.
• Tomas VAZQUEZ ROJAS, Dominique BOUTIN, Aliaa EL-HAGE, Sophie GAGNON, "Web-entretien | Retour d'expérience - Comment informer le public sur ses droits en période de pandémie ?", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 15, 2020.
• Tomas VAZQUEZ ROJAS, Jean-Paul BEVILACQUA, Julie MATHEWS, Katie SYKES, "Learning from experience | How to inform public of their rights in times of crisis", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 14, 2020.
• Ilona BOIS-DRIVET, Paul EMBLEY, Catherine LAWRENCE, "Justice and Fast Technological Shift - Canada and USA Situation", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 21, 2020.
• Laboratoire de cyberjustice, "Intelligence artificielle et données judiciaires", Espace CDPQ, January 30,  2020.
• Laboratoire de cyberjustice, "ICANN 2019", Cyberjustice Laboratory and ICANN, November 2-7, 2019.
• Laboratoire de cyberjustice, "Perspectives juridiques de l'intelligence artificielle et de la cyberjustice" , Summer School 2019,  June 3-8, 2019.
• Hannes WESTERMANN, Erwan JONCHÈRES, Louis ROY, Gilbert BABIN, "Résilience de la blockchain et de ses applications juridiques en temps de crise", virtual program of the Cyberjustice Laboratory, May 26, 2020.

Case studies & Evaluations

Working Group 1: Conflict Prevention

Subproject 1 - Pre-Conflict Decision Tools: Orienting Litigants and Defendants

• Case Study | Self-help tool for the Utah Court (Karl Branting) | In progress
• Case study | Self-help tool for Tax Law (Rémi Slama, M.A candidate) | In progress
• Case study | Self-help tool for Consumer Protection (Sebastien Meeùs, Ph.d candidate) | In progress
• Case study | Self-help tools for self-represented parties: Landlord and tenant Board (JusticeBot) | In progress
• Case study | JusticeBot Evaluation (Giampiero Lupo) | In progress

Subproject 2 – Pre-Conflict Decision Tools for Legal Practitioners

• Evaluation | Two kinds of external evaluations with real users | In progress
• Case study | Research on summarization (NSF Grant Project): The research is on the summaries provided by CanLii, in different legal fields | In progress
• Study case | Research on machine learning (NSF Grant Project): Identify sentences that explain statuary terms | In progress

Subproject 3 - Decision Support Tools For Tax, Administrative Authorities and Police

• Case study | Mondeling intrekken van bezwaar | In progress
• Case study | Evaluatie Covid-19 regelingen TOGS, TOZO en NOW | In progress
• Case study | Inkomenseisen aan vreemdelingen | In progress
• Case study | Maatwerk in de Wajong | In progress
• Case study | Extending the Legal Engineering Toolbox | In progress
• Case study | Data-driven AI: Recognizing complex financial patterns in bank transactions | In progress
• Case study | Knowledge driven AI: Qualitative reasoning using eFlint to express the normative reasoning part | In progress
• Case study | Hybrid AI: implementing a part of Wwft (anti money laundring law and preventing financing terrorism) | In progress
• Evaluation | ABM toolbox that serves as the basis for (ex-ante and expost) policy evaluation is now being tested. Experiments with different enforcement regimes (punishment/rewards/mixed) will soon be finished | In progress

Subproject 4 – Smart Contracts and Regulation Technologies

• Case study | Daniel AMYOT, David RESTREPO, Knowledge graph on 12-15 million decisions, 2 million conclusions from lawyers, and few million contracts |In progress
• Case study | Daniel AMYOT, David RESTREPO, Data protection and NLP | In progress

Working Group 2: Conflict Resolution

Subproject 5 - Pilot Project with the Office de la protection du consommateur du Québec (OPC)

• Evaluation | OPC:  directing consumers and users using nudges on the platform | In progress

Subproject 5 - Pilot Project with the Office de la protection du consommateur du Québec (OPC) & Subproject 6 - Pilot Project with the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT) of Ontario

• Case study |  Workshops on accessibility | In progress

Subproject 7 - Distributive Justice Processes Using Immersive Video Technologies

• Case study | Demonstration with courts and tribunals of immersive video conferencing in Australia (Victoria) & Canada | In progress
• Nicolas VERMEYS, Valentin CALLIPEL, Immigration Refugee Board of Canada: Virtual hearing Evaluation | Published

Subproject 9 - Decision Tools for Legal Practitioners And Adjudicators, Judges and Arbitrators

• Case study | VR experiments | In progress
• Case study | A high-end CISCO telepresence system into judge’s chambers. | In progress
• Evaluation | Worshops: User experience | In progress
• Evaluation | Learn the impacts on the actual users or consumers of virtual hearings | In progress
• Evaluation | Evaluating the use by major US federal agencies of virtual hearings, Ranges from organizations with few hearings to social security administration (for disability hearings in an average of non-pandemic year conducts 700.000 in person hearings and this year conducted 100.000 virtual hearings). | In progress

Working Group 3: Governance and policies

Subproject 11 - Empowerment of Marginalized Peoples

• Case studies | Selection of initiatives to be approached for interviews and in-depth data collection | Seven initiatives from: Canada, USA, India, Spain, Kenya, and South Africa | Preparation of questionnaire and data collection strategy | Data collection and field research: Zoom interviews and written questionnaires| To be published

Subproject 13 - Ethical and Socio-Political Issues of AI and Autonomization

• Case study |  4 Workshops on accessibility | In progress
• Evaluation | Influence of AI systems on judicial decision making (e.g., COMPASS) — designing systems and training judges so that AI input does not carry too much weight in decision making (2023-2024) | To be started
• Evaluation | Work on AI and explanations: lay perspectives on what is required in an explanation (2022-2023) | In progress

Subproject 15 - Security Issues Stemming from AI Tools

• Evaluation | Publication of literature review and conceptual framework for the security implications of AI in judging. Beginning of interviews with key informants in public and private sectors (2021-2022). | In progress