Start – 2019 | End – 2024 Duration – 5 years
Data collected in the judicial field are sensitive and often need to be anonymized. Access to this data must be subject to regulatory mechanisms that clarify what must be deleted, what can be used and exchanged, under what conditions and for what purposes.
![](http://ajcact.openum.ca/files/sites/160/2020/02/Pierre-LucDeziel-225x225.jpg)
Subproject chief
Pierre-Luc Déziel
Research activities
Case studies
A first case study to test what type of data can be extracted from the electronic records and if AI tools can be used to generate new information about individuals from this data will be carried out.
A second case study will focus on identifying core privacy concerns and issues associated with AI tools and to elaborate solutions to alleviate these concerns.
Inventories
The subproject will aim to do two inventories of studies, guidelines and best practices. The first will concern the technical and legal norms guiding online publication of court records.
The second will focus on privacy risks associated with AI tools in the context of conflict resolution and prevention, especially as they are relative to conversational agents.
Governance Framework
A Best Practices Guide and Governance Framework for the publication of online court records will be produced.
The subproject will also make recommendations on privacy risk management for the use of AI tools in the context of ODRs.
Publications of researchers
- Beauchemin, David, Nicolas Garneau, Eve Gaumond, Pierre-Luc Déziel, et Al. « Generating Intelligible Plumitifs Descriptions: Use Case Application with Ethical Considerations », (2020) In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, 15–21. Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Ignacio COFONE, "AI and Judicial Decision-Making", in Florian MARTIN-BARITEAU, Teresa SCASSA (dir.), Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada, Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, (2021).
- Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL, Karim BENYEKHLEF, Eve GAUMOND (dir.), "Repenser la protection des renseignements personnels à la lumière des défis soulevés par l’IA" working paper, Montreal, OBVIA, April 2020. PDF
- Lyse LANGLOIS, Réjean ROY, Guillaume MACAUX et Eve GAUMOND (dir.), « Analyse sur l'application de notification de contacts proposée par Mila », document de travail, OBVIA, juin 2020.
- Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL, "Petit guide sur les enjeux et opportunités des applications de notifications d’exposition à la COVID-19", OBVIA, June 2020. PDF
- Rocco BELLANOVA, Gloria GONZÁLEZ FUSTER, « Composting and Computing: On Digital Security Compositions », dans European Journal of International Security, (2019) 4-3, p. 345‑365, DOI : 10.1017/eis.2019.18.
- Ignacio N. COFONE, « Algorithmic Discrimination Is an Information Problem », (2019) No. 70-6, Hastings Law Journal, 1389.
- Nicolas GARNEAU, Eve GAUMOND, Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL, R. KHOURY, Luc LAMONTAGNE, « CriminalBART: A French Canadian Legal Language Model Specialized in Criminal Law », ICAIL 2021, 5 février 2021 (submitted).
- David RESTREPO-AMARILES, « From Computational Indicators to Law into Technologies: The Internet of Things, Data Analytics and Encoding in COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps », International Journal of Law in Context (forthcoming).
- Antonio Emerson Barros TOMAZ, José Cláudio do NASCIMENTO, Abdelhakim SENHAJI HAFID, José Neuman de SOUZA, « Preserving Privacy in Mobile Health Systems Using Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proof and Blockchain », (2020) No. 8.
- Nicolas VERMEYS, Dahlia CHALATI, « La sécurité des actes notariés dématérialisés », (2018) 120/3 Revue du Notariat, 479.
- Ignacio COFONE et Katherine J. STRANDBURG, « Strategic Games and Algorithmic Secrecy », (2019) 64-4 McGill Law Journal 623.
- Ignacio COFONE, « Antidiscriminatory Privacy », (2019) 72-1 SMU Law Review 139.
- Ignacio COFONE, « Servers and Waiters: What Matters in the Law of A.I », (2019) 21 Stanford Technology Law Review 167.
- Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL, « Est-ce bien nécessaire ? Le principe de limitation de la collecte face aux défis de l’intelligence artificielle et des données massives », (2020) 465 Développements récents en droit à la vie privée 1.
- Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL, « L’utilisation de renseignements personnels dans le contexte de la justice prédictive : le cas des outils actuariels d’évaluation des risques de récidive », (2018) 60 Archives de philosophie du droit 229.
- Pierre-Luc DÉZIEL, « Les limites du droit à la vie privée à l’ère de l’intelligence artificielle : groupes algorithmiques, contrôle individuel et cycle de traitement de l’information », (2018) 30-3 Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle p. 829-850.
- Gloria GONZÁLEZ FUSTER, « Book Review of Global Technology and Legal Theory: Transnational Constitutionalism, Google and the European Union by Guilherme Cintra Guimarăes », (2019) 5-4 European Data Protection Law Review 585.
Presentations :
Partners
Institutional partner |
Institutional partner |
Industrial partner |
Industrial partner |
Professional partner |
This content has been updated on 19 July 2024 at 15 h 14 min.